UNIT – IV
SKILLS
ANNEXE
4. HUMAN
VALUES AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
SUMMARY
‘India’s Contribution to World Unity’ is a short extract from a
lecture by the well known British historian Arnold J.Toynbee on the human values that he finds characteristic
of the Indian people. The historian writes that these values could very well be
of great relevance to the rest of the world.
Toynbee says that Indians have a
characteristic attitude towards life and towards the handling of human affairs.
Indians are free from rancour and do not hate their adversaries. Toynbee quotes the
example of India’s struggle for freedom. Once the struggle came to an end, the
Indians did not brood over the past and didn’t nurse any grievances against the
Britishers. He also points out that he was delivering this lecture at a
commemoration held in the memory of an Indian of Muslim religion. And Muslims
also invaded India before the Britishers.
TOYNBEE’S VIEWS ON GANDHI
Toynbee
recollects his last visit to Delhi when he paid his respects to Gandhiji at his
shrine. Standing here, he wonders whether there has ever been any leader like
Gandhi, who is a successful struggle for political liberation, has been a
benefactor not only to his nation but also to the nation from whose rule he
helped his own people to free themselves. Gandhiji made it impossible for the
Britishers to continue ruling India and he did it in such a way that the
British withdraw without any disgrace.
Toynbee praises Gandhiji because in
his struggle for liberation, he not only helped the Indians but also saved the
Britishers. If only the struggle had taken a violent form, neither of the
nations would be happy. Several such struggles remained as common tragedies of
history. Gandhiji saved Britain as well as India from such a tragedy by
inspiring the people of India to carry out their struggle on a spiritual plane.
TOYNBEE’S
VIEWS ON NON-VOILENCE
According to
Toynbee, Non-violent revolution is a characteristic Indian accomplishment. After
the successful independence struggle, non- violence has found a new field of
action in India’s domestic life. Here Toynbee gives reference to the Bhoodan
movement. He also refers to Emperor Ashoka who substituted religious propaganda
for military aggression as an instrument for unifying the world.
Speaking
on the importance of non-violence, Toynbee recalls the year 1945 when atom
bombs were dropped on Hiroshima & Nagasaki. He says that in this atomic
age, mankind cannot save itself from self-destruction unless we all practice
non-violence ignoring all provocations.
Toynbee points out the hostile
relation between India and China. He says that the Indians should remember
that it their obligation to go on setting an example of non-violence to the
rest of the world. Hence a great spiritual responsibility rests on India to
guide mankind towards self-preservation and not self- destruction.
The spirit of non-violence is inspired by a
moral ideal. The moral ideal is bound with the intellectual belief that human
beings have more than one approach to
truth and to salvation. While ‘truth’ is a glimpse of absolute Spiritual
Reality, ‘salvation’ is attaining harmony with Reality. This broad-minded
approach to Reality is a characteristic of India. A devout Shaiva or a devout
Vaishnava may claim that his own way is better than the others. Yet they
recognize that both are seeking the same truth and salvation in their own ways
and both ways are genuine. This Indian
appreciation of variety is a good ideal for the rest of the world.
Toynbee reminds us that we are living in an age of technology where we are physically neighbours but
psychologically strangers. If we need to avoid mutual destruction and to create
good relationships, we should value the variety of our human heritage. This is
the reason why India’s achievement of variety
–in-unity is of worldwide importance.
Lastly Toynbee points out that Gandhiji, in spite of his very busy
schedule, always made some time for
contemplation. This is also characteristic of the Indian tradition. He says
that today’s Indians irrespective of their urgent tasks, should take Gandhiji
as an example and should not allow these tasks to disturb one’s spiritual life.
Toynbee concludes that the unfortunately the Western people did not recognize and practice this virtue of
contemplation as in the Western Middle Ages. They have almost lost this art of
contemplation which is nothing but the art of living. The spiritual gift that
makes man human is still alive in the Indian soul. The Indians should go on
setting examples of it and save mankind from self destruction.
Q) HUMAN
VALUES CHACTERISTIC OF INDIAN PEOPLE( main points)
1.
freedom from rancour (hatred and anger towards adversaries)
2.
do not brood over the past
3.
do not nurse any grievances
4.
spirit of non-voilence
5.
belief in more than one approach to truth and salvation
6.
appreciation of variety, achieving variety-in-unity
7.
always making some time for contemplation
Q) Write a paragraph on “Human
Values” . (EXTERNAL EXAM - JUNE 2014)
EPITOME
OF WISDOM
4. THE
LAST LEAF - O. HENRY
“The Last Leaf” is a short, amusing story by
O. Henry . O. Henry’s actual name is William Sydney Porter. He is famous for
his unforgettable short stories. O. Henry’s stories are well known for their wit,
wordplay and unexpected ending.
|
SUMMARY
Johnsy and Sue are artists who move
into Greenwich Village and start a studio on top of a three storeyed building. All
the tenants in their colony are young
authors and artists drawing or writing for magazines. All the artists hope to
paint a masterpiece some day. As winter approaches, the weather gets colder and
Johnsy falls ill with Pneumonia. She is nursed by her roommate Sue. The doctor
visiting her tells Sue that Johnsy would recover if only she had the will to survive.
The sick girl lies in her bed
staring out of the window. On a rainy November day, while staring out of the
window, she observes the leaves falling from a vine on the opposite building
wall. She develops a strong belief that she will die when the last leaf falls.
Sue is panicked and does her best to
cheer up Johnsy but the sick girl refuses to improve. In vain, Sue visits an
old drunken artist Behrman living downstairs. She tells him that Johnsy needs a
reason to live. But the old man scoffs at this suggestion.
The next morning Johnsy observes
that there is still a last leaf on the vine in spite of the night’s heavy rain.
Johnsy realizes that her thoughts were wrong and she changes her mind. Soon she
starts recovering. The doctor assures her that now there are better chances of
her survival. He also tells them that the old man downstairs is stricken with
Pneumonia and has no chance of survival.
Sue tells Johnsy that after the
night’s heavy rain, the janitor found Berhman lying sick, wet and cold.
Outside, near the wall, there was a lantern, a ladder and his palette of paints
at the place where he had painted a single leaf on the wall – a leaf that will
never fall. Cold and wet from painting in the icy rain, he catches pneumonia
and dies. It was this last leaf which gave the girl the will to survive.
The story points out the power of the
will to survive. It ends in the surprise ending with the old man’s ultimate
sacrifice for the girl. It also points out that a ‘masterpiece’ is not just
something which makes one famous. Anything which has its good effect even on a
few people is also considered a masterpiece.
Q) How did Sue and Joanna become
friends?
Ans. Sue and Jonsy met each other at the table
d’hote of an English Street Delmonico’s.
One of them was from Maine and the other was from
California. They found that their tastes in art, chicory salad and bishop
sleeves were congenial. So they became friends and started a studio. The two
girls shared an affectionate bonding between them.
Q) Describe Greenwich
village?
Ans.
Greenwich village lies in a little district to the West of Washington
Square. The streets here were crazy at broke themselves at
strange angles and curves into small strips called ‘places’.
Some artists came here
looking for the houses with north windows, eighteenth century gables, Dutch
attics and low rents. They imported some pewter mugs and chafing dishes from
Sixth Avenue and settled down here as a colony.
Q) Who was Behrman?
Ans. Bherman was an old painter who lived on the
ground floor of the building where Sue and Johnsy lived. He was past sixty with
a beard like that of Michael Angelo’s Moses. He was a failure in art. He never
painted anything worthwhile except for some ads. He earned a little by serving
as a model for the young artists in the colony. He drank gin to the excess. He
was fierce and scoffed at softness in any one. He always dreamed of painting a
masterpiece but never attempted to accomplish it. There was a blank canvas on
an easel in his room for the past twenty five years waiting to receive the
first line of his masterpiece. He regarded himself as a mastiff in waiting to
protect the two girls in the studio.
Ultimately he sacrifices his
life for saving Johnsy and paints ‘the last leaf’ which is indeed his
masterpiece.
excellent source. Thank you
ReplyDelete